GPA-0.5 ???

[Bernhard Reiter]

--XuV1QlJbYrcVoo+x
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:17:10PM -0500, Jochen K=FCpper wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 22:18:57 +0100 Peter Gerwinski wrote:

> Peter> There was a deadline to meet. Keeping the CVS in sync and
> Peter> discussing everything on this list would have meant to miss it.

I don't see why.

> The question here is whether it was necessary to let get cvs out of
> sync from the start. =20

> One possible strength of OpenSource software is the peer-review
> process that you effectively circumvented before coming up with the
> 0.5.0 version of gpa that now is widely spread into userland, towards
> people that are not supposed to be beta-testers.

In order to protect these people we probably have to=20
call the gpa-0.5.0 unofficial.=20

> It just looks very strange that nothing is going on with the sources
> of a open project and all the sudden there is a new version. =20

Peter did not tell us what he was doing.


--XuV1QlJbYrcVoo+x
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjyXWRsACgkQh9ag3dpKERYS8gCgurzPsg6xzWlBJZIYqpq1mWqY
XfYAoI7flKCJAyzdXoohi6qgnlZmZ0XY
=XsMg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XuV1QlJbYrcVoo+x--