Help, I'm confused (how to package cryptplug)

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Monday 19 April 2004 14:27, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:17:34 +0200, Michael Nottebrock said:
> > gpg-agent and gpgsm into the gnupg-1.9.x versions, the deprecation of
> > newpg and the recent updates to libgcrypt, all those programs have
> > become ever harder to sync.
>
> Frankly, I hope that things will get better now.  newpg used to be
> only a transitional package.
>
> > Can anybody tell me what is the recommended way to provide the crypto
> > plugins right now? Use the development branch of gnupg and
>
> For the old Kmail (the one using cryptplug), you definitely need to
> use gpgme-0.3.16.  This will still work with the old backend but is of
> paramount importance when using the new backend.

Just to make sure I'm getting this right: gnupg 1.9.x (== the backend?) can be 
built with both gpgme-0.3.16 (which I would need to do, since it's the gpgme 
version available in ports and I want to provide crypto plugins for the kmail 
in KDE_3_2_BRANCH) and gpgme-0.4.x?

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040419/1c139f1b/attachment-0001.bin