Help, I'm confused (how to package cryptplug)
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Mon Apr 19 15:01:44 CEST 2004
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:23:08 +0200, Michael Nottebrock said:
> Just to make sure I'm getting this right: gnupg 1.9.x (== the backend?) can be
> built with both gpgme-0.3.16 (which I would need to do, since it's the gpgme
Better to say: Applications linked against gpgme-0.3.16 may be *used*
with GnuPG >= 1.9.x (as well as with the old newpg).
GnuPG >= 1.9 may be used with any GPGME version >= 0.3.16 (including
of course 0.4.x).
> version available in ports and I want to provide crypto plugins for the kmail
> in KDE_3_2_BRANCH) and gpgme-0.4.x?
As I always get the Kmail/KDE versions wrong, Marc should answer
this;-)
Just to make it clear what the backend consists of:
GnuPG 1.9
including the programs gpgsm, gpg2 gpg-agent, scdaemon and gpgconf
(gpg2 is basically an older version of gpg 1.3.x and it is in
general better to use the regular gpg (gnupg 1.2.x or gnupg
1.3.x) - thus we changed the name to gpg2)
Dirmngr
pinentry
Well, actually it is a kind of hermaphrodite as it is used
by the backend but actually be a part of the frontend (visible by
the user)
GPGME is part of the backend from the view of the developers but not
from a user's POV because it is linked to Kmail and other KDE apps.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
More information about the Gpa-dev
mailing list