Help, I'm confused (how to package cryptplug)
Michael Nottebrock
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Mon Apr 19 15:06:12 CEST 2004
On Monday 19 April 2004 15:01, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:23:08 +0200, Michael Nottebrock said:
> > Just to make sure I'm getting this right: gnupg 1.9.x (== the backend?)
> > can be built with both gpgme-0.3.16 (which I would need to do, since it's
> > the gpgme
>
> Better to say: Applications linked against gpgme-0.3.16 may be *used*
> with GnuPG >= 1.9.x (as well as with the old newpg).
>
> GnuPG >= 1.9 may be used with any GPGME version >= 0.3.16 (including
> of course 0.4.x).
Cool.
> Just to make it clear what the backend consists of:
>
> [...]
Thanks!
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040419/8aa52f29/attachment.bin
More information about the Gpa-dev
mailing list