Help, I'm confused (how to package cryptplug)

Michael Nottebrock michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Mon Apr 19 15:06:12 CEST 2004


On Monday 19 April 2004 15:01, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:23:08 +0200, Michael Nottebrock said:
> > Just to make sure I'm getting this right: gnupg 1.9.x (== the backend?)
> > can be built with both gpgme-0.3.16 (which I would need to do, since it's
> > the gpgme
>
> Better to say: Applications linked against gpgme-0.3.16 may be *used*
> with GnuPG >= 1.9.x (as well as with the old newpg).
>
> GnuPG >= 1.9 may be used with any GPGME version >= 0.3.16 (including
> of course 0.4.x).

Cool.


> Just to make it clear what the backend consists of:
>
> [...]

Thanks!

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040419/8aa52f29/attachment.bin


More information about the Gpa-dev mailing list