PR 119 [was: Report about currently open gpgweb problem reports.]

[Noel D. Torres Taño]

Lorenzo Cappelletti wrote:
> 
> On Fri May 23 at 10:11 +0100, Noel D. Torres Taño wrote:
> 
> > to previous standards. I think actually can be safe to support HTML 4=
.01
> > and CSS 1. I can't, for example, view some pages from my workplace.
> 
> There's no problem with HTML 4.01 since XHTML is just a more strict
> revision.  IMHO, switching to HTML 4.01 would be as simple as changing
> the HTML file header.
> 
> > The problem is not that specific browser, but the couple of old brows=
ers
> > all the world around. I can take care of that, if you want. I have so=
me
> > ideas to support them.
> 
> Go on and share them with us! ;-)
> 
For some pages I created in my previous work, I used a quite simple
method: I created a page with a javascript redirecting to another page,
HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 1.0 and, if you can't view the javascript,
you'll see a HTML 2 page. The idea is to have two versions: one general
with latest standards (then) and another one suited for old browsers.
This one is HTML 2 without any kind of CSS, Dynamic HTML, Java nor
javascript. And it worked.

Envite