Reading new key packages (Re: Coexistence with OpenPGP/IETF)

Andrew Gallagher andrewg at andrewg.com
Tue Jan 2 14:31:15 CET 2024


On 2 Jan 2024, at 13:24, Werner Koch via LibrePGP-discuss <librepgp-discuss at librepgp.org> wrote:
> 
> Frankly, I would like to use the v6 signature format because it allows
> for larger subpackets.  But not at the cost of losing the meta data
> signing.  However, the larger sub-packets are not a really issue right
> now - even not with PQC.

Hi, Werner. Would allowing type 40 subpackets in v6 sigs as well as v4 address this concern?

A

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://librepgp.org/pipermail/librepgp-discuss/attachments/20240102/b973fcaf/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://librepgp.org/pipermail/librepgp-discuss/attachments/20240102/b973fcaf/attachment.sig>


More information about the LibrePGP-discuss mailing list