Netscape GPG

Brian Galbraith
Wed, 05 Jan 2000 22:05:10 -0000 (GMT)

Hash: SHA1

On 05-Jan-2000 Lars Hecking wrote:

> I'm am highly surprised that even on this list, more than half of all
> signed messages are using the deprecated old style signing method.
> Is mutt the only MUA to get that right? PGP/MIME, anyone?
> XFMail seems to be one of the worst offenders, don't know about pine
> and elm.
OK I use XFMail, but I am not taking it personally.....perhaps its because ithe deprecated style always works , even if it is old. I have to use a windows system at work, and until recently used Eudora to screen any private mail which arrives during the day. I do not know why, but I am unable to verify or decrypt any Mutt PGP/MIME messages. Anyone know why? Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Digital Signatures Verify Author and Unaltered Content iD8DBQE4c7+QEPpEmWPrp2URApdGAKCMPHx+iealD08WFtx45BSdaQwGEgCeK88K QJdXyP2yvaQHD4LtU5JWAOA= =Itm2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----