RSA PKCS#1 signing: differs from OpenSSL's?

[Dean Scarff]

libgcrypt 1.2.2's gcry_pk_sign appears to fail an equivalence test
with OpenSSL 0.9.6m's RSA_sign(3).

This is based on the output of
<http://scarff.id.au/file/gcrypt_vs_openssl.c>, which runs without
aborting and demonstrates that the signatures produced are different.
Is this correct libgcrypt behaviour?  I'd have filed a bug but I'm
unsure if I've just misinterpreted the API.

My understanding is that both routines should be doing the same thing:
adding PKCS#1 block 1 padding including the ASN1DER for MD5, then
using the secret key operation to sign the result.  They should
therefore have equivalent output.  I'm also confident that RSA_sign(3)
is correct.

-- 
Dean