--yes option working?
Werner Koch
wk at isil.d.shuttle.de
Fri May 22 07:38:55 CEST 1998
Karl Fogel <kfogel at floss.onshore.com> writes:
> Use this key anyway?
>
> I had thought that GPG would assume the answer to be "yes", since I
> passed the "--yes" flag, but it prompted me anyway.
Make sure that there is enough trust for this user. The definition of
--yes is "assume yes on _most_ questions".
I can see that that is not an alternative for you, but simple pass a
--yes or (hypothetical) --strong-yes is not good. What you should do
is:
- if you get such an error message (I should add a status error
message (to avoid NLS probs) for this (see --status-fd))
- use a list option ( --list-key --with-colons ):
"pub::768:16:E1139763E1D81275:1998-02-09:0:::we..."
!--- you should find some trust information here ;-)
to show the user that it is not secure to use this key
OR
- the status information (which I should add) can you give
a hint about the problem
AND THEN
- use a new option to override this check.
There is no such option yet and I'm thinking whether to add some kind
of "--force-xxx" or a way to say that key xy is always trusted (this
may be better because I can record this in the TrustDB).
Please don't use such a --force option per default. I'll add some
stuff soon.
Werner
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list