problems with 0.9.5b (CVS)

Thomas Roessler roessler at
Mon Apr 19 12:35:43 CEST 1999

On 1999-04-18 15:24:00 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:

>> pub:u:1280:1:3E2500EF593238E1:1996-01-19::3017:-:Thomas Roessler
>> <roessler at>:

>> uid:q::::::::Thomas Roessler <Thomas.Roessler at Sobolev.Rhein.DE>:

> Fixed (but a bad hack).  Now that we have validity information for
> every uid, I think it makes sense to print all uids and do not
> merge the forst one with the "pub" line.  Right or would it break
> any code?

Umh...  The parser code in the unstable mutt should be able to
handle this, the stable code won't.  This is not so nice since the
new parser assumes a considerably different data structur which I
didn't want to back-port.  Maybe you coul d make this an option?

> I could argue, that they are anyway only usable with RSA/IDEA.  But
> okay, I see that there is a problem.  Maybe a solution is to allow
> this only for RSA keys in v3 packets which do have a "ENCR" in it?
> Simply allowing non self-signed sigs may produce some other
> problems - please give me some time to think about it.



More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list