[GPGME] gpgme_get_key vs. gpgme_op_keylist_start

[Albrecht Dreß]

Am 06.05.06 11:00 schrieb(en) Stephan Menzel:
> Before that, you couldn't use S/MIME with kmail at all unless of course  
> you do the installation yourself which can be quite tricky.

I know, so I collected some instructions for Balsa (looked over them  
today, but they /may/ be somewhat out of date):
http://www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-dreszal/balsa/balsa23-secure-mail.html

> I have done quite a lot of development integrating gpgme into our  
> software and up to now I didn't have any serious problems, which makes  
> me wonder why it is still considered way experimental. Can anyone here  
> tell me if there's any kind of schedule for gpgme/gpgsm to become beta?

I would *strongly* support such a move, at least for the gpgsm part!

> I'll give it a try.

Thanks in advance!

Cheers, Albrecht.



-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Albrecht Dreß  -  Johanna-Kirchner-Straße 13  -  D-53123 Bonn (Germany)
        Phone (+49) 228 6199571  -  mailto:albrecht.dress at arcor.de
   GnuPG public key:  http://www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-dreszal/pubkey.asc
_________________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20060506/f650b14b/attachment.pgp