Can't send complete key to servers

Ben Paul Wise bwise@sito.saic.com
Fri Apr 13 22:07:01 2001


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Werner,

Thanks for the clarification. The public keys returned by the server do not 
have any invalid signatures in them, so far as I can tell.

Is there any discussion of Photo ID or Biometric ID becoming part of a future 
standard?

On Friday 13 April 2001 13:51, Werner Koch allegedly wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Ben Paul Wise wrote:
> > Is there a way to put keys on a server so that people get them with the
> > picture? If the protocol allows it, then what am I doing wrong?
>
> I guess you mean what I call Photo ID and NAI calls Biometric
> Indetification Packet.
>
> This is not part of OpenPGP and violates the standard. They use a
> packet number which is neither assigned by OpenPG nor in the range
> for private extensons. GnuPG has some minimal support for it but due
> to lacking specs for that packet there is nothing more we know.
>
> IMHO, the keyserver behaves correctly if it drops these packets. I
> have not expected that they can handle it at all and assume that the
> won't drop the binding signature for the PhotoID so that you have at
> leas one invalid signature - well I am not sure of course.
>
> Ciao,
>
> Werner
- -- Ben Wise, PhD Mobile: 703-731-5144 SAIC GnuPG ID: 0xF491BD21 http://www.saic.com bwise@sito.saic.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6105/l4mNkvSRvSERAiuVAJ414PsDOWNJH6vB93pLPp/2CHzJzACdG1VQ aKEGOAOVwS1pqkCfvyPx3lg= =ATxz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----