effects and incompatibilities between GPG1.0.6 and PGP CKT 0

[Kurt Fitzner]

This message is in MIME format
--_=XFMail.1.5.0.Linux:20010712181716:4636=_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On 11-Jul-2001 Kai Raven wrote:
> 
> And this is imo important, because more and more people will be changing
> from PGP to GnuPG or CKT - take a look at the PGP NG's.
> 

The PGP International web page links to the PGP Interactions Page which is all
but advertising for the CKT versions:

   Note: NAI announced that source code may no longer be available
   for current and future PGP versions. Many users are switching to
   PGP6.5.8ckt.

   http://rmarq.pair.com/pgp/pgp7.html#ver701

So yes, more and more people will be switching.  Imad's rantings about GnuPG
on the news groups is a little dissappointing, but are there any real serious
interoperability issues?  There seem to be more features in 6.5.8ckt that
GnuPG doesn't support (revoking authority, adding pictures, etc) than the
other way around.

        Kuer.


--_=XFMail.1.5.0.Linux:20010712181716:4636=_
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAwAGBQI7Tj4LAAoJEN366Kf2Ie2tk8UIAIdnXsK6C1QO9W3/Xf7GRse1
hzFs+H+niG5c63bHu2yd+CKSB0sYYeGELA2gDx9hRnsQWK7Xdd+/8/AL4zgY0C5Y
eHtD57Rszv3L7/tpNhPqaKKUywyMasV/q9Wr9NpH+2N1ylBv5I0/9p+LpNC2au7z
+XhbkeTVtkRPt6w3mARxN7A+MzY8mWm6NkwQO+FZ3KdTcJQ1jD1NKJwCQrbJwas6
ONqMXKaZp26C3qOfMwd+zjuUernFtU3l4ZFXq3WTcxkXLJ/FAKUYMwks7+b+995p
N4gTTMayIpsspgUzjhc/SmPNzQoMQxXyx9gFeUWAG37CjmcTVbhguRmAUGc0lWI=
=N07i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--_=XFMail.1.5.0.Linux:20010712181716:4636=_--
End of MIME message