Imad

[Rich]

On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:51:03 -0400 (EDT)
"Anthony E. Greene" <agreene@pobox.com> wrote:

>A lot of what he says aout the GPL is just plain wrong, even though the
>GPL is available for anyone to read.
>
>A lot of what he says about GnuPG/PGP compatibility is wrong too. Anyone
>who has used both tools knows better and I'm not sure it's worth the time
>to convince people who don't already know better.

  Yes, but specifically what I was talking about was his
insinuation that the fine GnuPG developers have "altered" the
binary W32 version.

 Here is his quote (as much as I didn't want this to devolve into
a "he said she said" kind of thing):

----------------------------8<------------------------------

OK, please do yourself a favor.
Download the offcial binary distribution of GnuPG for windows.
Also download the official source code distribution of GnuPG.
Compile it yourself, and compare it with the official binary
distribution, and by all means do let us all know what your findings are.
And we will go on from there for the other juicy stuff...

----------------------------8<------------------------------
 
  I have the whole signed message around here somewhere. But that
was the snippet that was the most blatant.

 Rich...