explain nrsign & lsign?

[John W. Moore III]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

snowcrash+gnupg-users wrote:

> if my purpose it to impart additional 'confidence' in "B" to _others_,
> by signing it with "A", then i would *NOT* want to 'lsign', but rather
> just sign/tsign, *and* publish the pubkey for "A".
> 
> correct?

YES, this would do it; however, proper etiquette would be to *not* send
B's Key to the Servers, but rather to returned it 'Signed' to B and let
B make any 'publication' decisions/actions.  There are folks who are
_very_ picky about their Keys being in General Circulation!

JOHN :-\
Timestamp: Sunday 28 Jan 2007, 14:06  --500 (Eastern Standard Time)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7-svn4405: (MingW32)
Comment: Public Key at:  http://tinyurl.com/8cpho
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My Homepage:  http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJFvPRBAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPxncH/Alj8Z2e+Gq+FU80R6kUOl6X
gMh+l7cCvd3NMwXibwXTiDcJoSoecfsaPwxhhPYqyfWacbrPFTPJl/eHd9TlW4fJ
fzuuudtwnA59Xftx/v9qmzFLKZaOpXbC9LQegxokKs88LGqhL/DiPX4un4rP/xaG
ahYr+ZPM3UnYVGvV/hEUkAuZxZlSwRwf6ZJ8BleGbqMe2r6UBlOxdh6x9hPm9dTt
xJk4c4c/xEYqD1iVhdfIg7gVVHgX2iJ+kGcNANaKRP+R0F0SJ86wufTzWrps6YkM
57p2c2UhyNdL+RzgIPX+1dacSMD6HMhe07V+m2iim7gyGv5fSbiL7Dg5TvNo3LQ=
=UZgm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----