Naming of GnuPG

Chris Walters cjw2004d at comcast.net
Fri Apr 25 15:29:14 CEST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

David Shaw wrote:
| Do people find the 1.4.x / 2.0.x thing confusing?

I can only speak for myself.  I don't find the 1.4.x / 2.0.x version numbering
thing confusing at all.  They each serve a different purpose and a different
audience.  I note that, currently, 1.4.x needs to be patched to compile in
support for IDEA, while 2.0.x has it, and a lot of other capabilities already
there.

I have compiled both on both GNU/Linux and Win32, and found that, as long as I
have the appropriate libraries, they both will compile and work correctly.  Of
course, I am a programmer, so I am used to separate versions of the same program.

Regards,
Chris

PS:  Sorry David, I hit the wrong button and forgot to check who I was sending
this message to.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=jtAs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list