Gnupg good for big groups?
Robert J. Hansen
rjh at sixdemonbag.org
Sat Aug 7 20:22:19 CEST 2010
On 8/7/2010 1:58 PM, MFPA wrote:
> Whether fully automated or ran on demand, I'm quite surprised *nobody*
> was interested.
One person said they would use it. The overall reaction was negative.
These things happen. Sometimes, the tool you think people need isn't
the tool they want. :)
> I take it the "spam overhead problem" you refer to is things like "not
> encrypted to my key" messages?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5598 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Gnupg-users