Gnupg good for big groups?

Robert J. Hansen rjh at
Sat Aug 7 20:22:19 CEST 2010

On 8/7/2010 1:58 PM, MFPA wrote:
> Whether fully automated or ran on demand, I'm quite surprised *nobody*
> was interested.

One person said they would use it.  The overall reaction was negative.
These things happen.  Sometimes, the tool you think people need isn't
the tool they want.  :)

> I take it the "spam overhead problem" you refer to is things like "not
> encrypted to my key" messages?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5598 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20100807/e9dbad0e/attachment.bin>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list