Gnupg good for big groups?

Ingo Klöcker kloecker at
Sun Aug 8 11:07:25 CEST 2010

On Saturday 07 August 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 8/7/2010 1:58 PM, MFPA wrote:
> > Whether fully automated or ran on demand, I'm quite surprised
> > *nobody* was interested.
> One person said they would use it.  The overall reaction was
> negative. These things happen.  Sometimes, the tool you think people
> need isn't the tool they want.  :)

And sometimes people think they don't want or need it until they have 
tried it and realize that they cannot live without it anymore. :-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20100808/1b5f9f65/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list