timestamp notation @gnupg.org
jerome at jeromebaum.com
Tue Jun 28 11:56:25 CEST 2011
>> While I didn't see/read the ages-old thread that was mentioned before,
>> you allegedly even agreed to implement something roughly equivalent in
>> the past.
> Did I? I only recall that once I changed the generation code to make
> sure the timestamp of the self-signatures, the primary key and the
> subkeys are all the same.
As I said, I didn't read the thread.
How about the use cases I presented? Any problems with those?
email jerome at jeromebaum.com
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A
PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
More information about the Gnupg-users