timestamp notation @gnupg.org

[Jerome Baum]

>> While I didn't see/read the ages-old thread that was mentioned before,
>> you allegedly even agreed to implement something roughly equivalent in
>> the past.
>
> Did I?  I only recall that once I changed the generation code to make
> sure the timestamp of the self-signatures, the primary key and the
> subkeys are all the same.

As I said, I didn't read the thread.

How about the use cases I presented? Any problems with those?

-- 
Jerome Baum
tel +49-1578-8434336
email jerome at jeromebaum.com
web www.jeromebaum.com
--
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A
PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA
--
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es