Future of GnuPG 1.x.x?

[Laurent Jumet]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


Hello Sin !

Sin Trenton <biggles.trenton at gmail.com> wrote:

> The reason I ask is I have tried 2.x and even with various utf-8 settings,
> signed mail fail verification approx 50% of the time for others as my client
> does with theirs. English works fine, but it seems mail containing
> Swedish/Danish/Czech letters (æ, ø, å, ä, ?, ?, ?, etc) get mucked up.

    I had some problems with non english characters too, but seems it depends 
on text translations on my own board.
    With your special characters above, my signature looks good here.

- -- 
Laurent Jumet
      KeyID: 0xCFAF704C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32)

iHEEAREDADEFAlAd/qkqGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucG9pbnRkZWNoYXQubmV0LzB4Q0ZB
RjcwNEMuYXNjAAoJEPUdbaDPr3BMnfQAoNGVy7Y9SptPTkxPPJL9ut6O6WP0AKCO
6hmiZptSPGev3mViipbtB/yafg==
=6a+y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----