aaron.toponce at gmail.com
Wed Jun 27 15:33:26 CEST 2012
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:44:11PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:12, aaron.toponce at gmail.com said:
> > So, if the system can be improved by removing support for PGP2, which
> > includes cleaning up code, squashing bugs, and tightening security, then
> > why is it still around? 20 years later?
> BTW, removing the v3 support will not make the code magically less
> complex. Removing mature code may actually introduce more bugs than
> keeping it.
Thus, the reason I began with 'if'. :)
. o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
. . o . o o o . o . o o . . o
o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 519 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gnupg-users