Fwd: It's time for PGP to die.

MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Tue Aug 19 21:12:31 CEST 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Monday 18 August 2014 at 1:25:41 PM, in
<mid:53F1F0C5.7000509 at sixdemonbag.org>, Robert J. Hansen wrote:


> Basically, if the fact you know something would tend to
> implicate you in the commission of a crime, then you
> can't be compelled to reveal that you know it.  Whether
> it's a passphrase or a safe combination makes no
> difference.

So why couldn't somebody just claim that to be the case when it
wasn't?

- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

Ultimate consistency lies in being consistently inconsistent
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlPzoaRXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pQX8D/0qgcRq+CLXWxsfh+X5b/gNr1mSqGrT+LrBx
/O7kEeZVlIdMjbh+1XWHTQfnQ/E4aIBp3Uv/lr37SOTS0KbmMJzEI7KV6CwLTfbO
1SJGYp2KlF16kPzc4P3TBp0abh+YrANaQYpPbWoy6n8krerpd0LHS9GjvVMTiu4G
R++Am4yR
=Zcv+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list