MIME or inline signature ?

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



On Monday 16 February 2015 at 5:38:08 AM, in
<mid:m0lhjy8lhb.fsf at kcals.intra.maillard.im>, Xavier Maillard wrote:


> One more argument in favor of the inline: it questions
> my fellows; what are these cabalistic caracters and
> then you can what's the purpose of all of this.

I like that advantage of keeping it all visible in the message body.
But don't recall ever having been asked the question.

- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

Man is not a rational animal, he is a rationalising animal.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=
=z/ea
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----