2.1.2: keyserver route failure

[Peter Lebbing]

On 18/02/15 18:07, Johan Wevers wrote:
> Admit it, IPv6 has failed. It may get some uses, but the widespread
> adaptation of carrier NAT has made it largely obsolete.

Tired as I may be of this discussion (what's your next argument, NAT provides
beneficial firewalling behaviour?), I still wish to say that I will not "admit"
IPv6 has failed or that IPv4 advancements[1] made it obsolete. Get off your soapbox.

Peter.

[1] I shudder to call NAT an advancement, but that's apparently how you present it.

-- 
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter>