How to clarity a deep technical issue (Re: Seeking Assurance on Security and Memory Leaks in SuSE GnuPG)

[Bernhard Reiter]

Hi Steffen,

Am Samstag 01 Oktober 2022 18:23:19 schrieb Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Highly disturbing to me are such poisoning emails like you write
> continuously. 

please be respectful and try to assume best intentions.

> The software you talk about is classified to be 
> used by governments to some extend, and i rather have Werner and
> his team work on improving this big software suite than answering
> mails 

The people doing certifications, just like all developers, inkluding me, you 
and Werner do make mistakes sometimes. And it is a good property of Free 
Software that everyone can inspect it. So I do not mind questions, even if 
they point out to unlikely defects. Yes, maybe not Werner should answer them,
but someone else can help to outline what the next steps are
to understand what the software is doing
for someone who really wants to know.

Best Regards
Bernhard

-- 
https://intevation.de/~bernhard   +49 541 33 508 3-3
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20221025/af0a2aad/attachment.sig>