GPA and GPGME
Werner Koch
wk@gnupg.org
Tue Oct 29 19:17:02 2002
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:32:48 +0100, Miguel Coca said:
> I'm testing GPA with the latest stable GPGME (although with a simple fix of
> my own that I've already sent to Marcus) and GnuPG 1.2.1 and it works fine.
Marcus is on vacation until next week; he will then work on the signature
API with priority.
> Also, concerning the user interface, I don't like the fact that GPA uses
> "trust" to refer to both the key trust and the owner trust. It would
Yes, please replace it.
> probably make sense to replace "key trust" with something else. However,
> based on my own experiences as a newbie, I dislike using "validity". Are
> there any suggestions?
The only thing I can suggest is to use either "key is valid" or "key
is NOT valid" instead of the 4 leves we currently use. "trustworthy"
might be an alternative but then you have "trust" back again.
> In line with that, I'd like to keep the "change ownertrust" dialog out of
> the edit dialog. That way we could reserve "edit" to manage your own private
> key. For example, to manage user ID's and subkeys.
Perfect.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner