Distribution of binary

[Peter Lebbing]

Hello Niibe!

On 14/12/2018 01:23, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
>   (c) Selling it at eBay (or equivalent).
> 
> If it will happen, the step (c) violates the assumption of experimental
> personal use, and it will put FSIJ into difficult situation about their
> management of VID.  I'd say that the step (c) constitutes a distribution
> of binary, if I were a lawyer.

Yes, that would be bad. If we could quickly decide on the proper
vendor/product strings for VID:PID 1209:2440, I can simply tell anyone
interested to use that.

I don't even know if I'll be giving anybody a board :-). I mean, I'm not
going to walk around with a sign with a big arrow that says "free GnuKs
for experiments available here" :-).

Regards,

Peter.

[1] <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnuk-users/2018-December/000132.html>
[2] <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnuk-users/2018-December/000133.html>

-- 
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnuk-users/attachments/20181222/3465660f/attachment.sig>